football-player football-score football-helmet football-ball Accuracy Arm-Strength Balance Ball-Security Ball-Skills Big-Play-Ability Block-Deconstruction Competitive-Toughness Core-Functional-Strength Decision-Making Discipline Durability Effort-Motor Elusivness Explosiveness Football-IQ Footwork Functional-Athleticism Hand-Counters Hand-Power Hand-Technique Hands Lateral-Mobility Leadership Length Mechanics Mobility Pass-Coverage-Ability Pass-Protection Pass-Sets Passing-Down-Skills Pocket-Manipulation Poise Power-at-POA Progressions RAC-Ability Range Release-Package Release Route-Running Run-Defending Separation Special-Teams-Ability-1 Versatility Vision Zone-Coverage-Skills Anchor-Ability Contact-Balance Man-Coverage-Skills Tackling Lifted Logic Web Design in Kansas City clock location phone email play chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right chevron-up facebook tiktok checkbox checkbox-checked radio radio-selected instagram google plus pinterest twitter youtube send linkedin search arrow-circle bell left-arrow right-arrow tdn-mark filled-play-circle yellow-arrow-circle dark-arrow-circle star cloudy snowy rainy sunny plus minus triangle-down link close drag minus-circle plus-circle pencil premium trash lock simple-trash simple-pencil eye cart
NFL Draft

Kellen Mond: Contextualized Quarterbacking 2021

  • The Draft Network
  • April 7, 2021
  • Share

For anyone new to the family here at The Draft Network, Contextualized Quarterbacking is an annual project I put together for TDN Premium subscribers. In Contextualized Quarterbacking, I chart the significant draft-eligible quarterbacks across their final seasons, tagging each dropback with a ton of situational features that allow us to understand their game at more specific and situational levels.

Each throw is graded both for Accuracy and for Ball Placement. Accuracy is a general metric for catchable passes—an accurate pass is a catchable pass—while Placement scores take more details into account: maximizing YAC opportunities, protecting the wide receiver from unnecessary hits, and protecting the ball from being played on by the defensive back. Throws are also charted relative to depth and passing direction, to understand how target distribution affects accuracy scores for each quarterback. It’s harder to throw deep!

Contextualized Quarterbacking helps us understand what each college offense asked of their quarterback, which gives us an additional tool for projecting these passers to the pros. When we understand their college offense, we can better identify those skills that will translate to the pro level, and accordingly, project the ideal scheme fits for each player.

Not even Contextualized Quarterbacking, with all of its… you know, contextualizing… can really capture the exhilaration of the Kellen Mond rollercoaster. The accuracy and placement numbers are generally below average, but there are some really sick throws on Mond’s film, and his arm allows for him to hit closing windows that other quarterbacks in this class wouldn’t dare try. Of course, for every sick throw, there’s an accompanying head-scratcher.

At the end of the day, Mond was a four-year starter who finished his career with the best supporting cast he’s ever had, in a pro-style passing attack, and was at times dominant (Arkansas) and at times an active limiter on his team’s success (LSU, UNC). It’s tough to project much more growth from what is now a mercurial enigma of a passer.


Left Middle Right
20+ 4.1% 5.9% 2.4%
10-19 7.2% 16.6% 6.9%
0-9 9.0% 33.1% 3.8%
<0 0.3% 10.0% 0.7%


Left Middle Right
20+ 3.7% 15.0% 4.0%
10-19 2.1% 19.3% 4.9%
0-9 8.9% 28.3% 4.1%
<0 0.8% 8.1% 0.8%

Mond is one of the most diligent intermediate passers in this class, up there with Zach Wilson, and there’s some similarity in how they get there. Both have zippy balls, quick releases, and the ability to throw from off-platform to buy a little extra time and distribute the ball. While Wilson has a penchant for avoiding interceptable balls, Mond has the opposite, so Texas A&M’s insistence on giving him routes in the most crowded area of the field seems counterintuitive. Mond’s accuracy numbers get bogged down by this aggressiveness, as he regularly throws the ball into tight coverage looks that offer no chance for a safe and accurate football, and growth into more risk-averse decision-making would, perhaps, lead to a boost in efficacy for an objectively talented passer.


Left Middle Right
20+ .455 .604 .573
10-19 .523 .746 .571
0-9 .672 .801 .628
<0 1.000 .989 1.000


Left Middle Right
20+ .401 .425 .432
10-19 .528 .562 .499
0-9 .729 .781 .723
<0 1.000 .895 1.000

Mond has superior ball placement metrics to the other Day 2 QB target in this class, Stanford’s Davis Mills, while also possessing better physical tools and a background in a more traditional, pro-inspired passing offense. He is easily the best candidate for QB6 off the board, even with his extensive and rather fruitless history in the SEC considered. A cleanly stratified chart of placement numbers indicate that Mond’s big arm may never translate into consistent explosive plays downfield, but in a pinch, Mond is a workable candidate for immediate starts in the NFL in traditional West Coast offenses that work from the pocket and offer heavy shallow crossers and flats, as Mond throws those routes well.

Please click here for access to the full data sheet including QB alignment, X-step drops, MOFO/MOFC coverage, first read, beyond first read, pressured vs. unpressured, and much more.

Filed In

Related Articles

Written By

The Draft Network